According to Punch, there were indications on
Tuesday that the Federal Government would opt for a
retaliatory measure if the United Kingdom went ahead to implement
its proposed £3,000 visa bond. Nigeria was said to have
made this known during a private meeting between Foreign
Affairs Minister, Olugbenga Ashiru, and British High
Commissioner, Andrew Pocock, in Abuja.
The PUNCH had reported
exclusively on Tuesday that the Federal Government summoned Pocock over the
policy which it said was capable of harming the existing cordial
relationship between the two countries. Nigeria is one of the six countries whose
nationals would be required to pay the £3,000 bond under a proposed
policy that will take effect in November. The others are India, Bangledish,
Ghana, Pakistan and Sri Lanka.
It was gathered that Pocock admitted at the
meeting with Ashiru that the UK planned to introduce the “financial bond
as a way of tackling abuse in the immigration system”, but added, “No final
decision has been made.”
Ashiru, who was said to have recalled the
days when nationals of Commonwealth travelled freely to the UK
and other member states, expressed displeasure over the
policy which he described as not only “discriminatory but
capable of undermining the spirit of the Commonwealth family.”
A source privy to the meeting said, “The
minister conveyed the reservations of the Federal Government to Pocock,
who said the policy was still a proposal. The minister reminded him
of British investments in Nigeria and vice-versa.
“He asked him to think about the implications a
retaliatory measure would have on the two countries. The minister stressed that
Nigeria might also impose £3,000 visa bond on British nationals coming
into the country too.” After the meeting, the ministry issued a statement in
which it recalled “the strong historical bonds between the peoples of the
various countries who were all regarded at that time as Commonwealth citizens.”
It further “recalled that this time-honoured
practice was unilaterally jettisoned by the UK in 1985, thereby
weakening the bonds of the Commonwealth family.”
According to the statement by the
spokesperson for the ministry, Ogbole Ode, Ashiru told the British
envoy “that the proposed policy would definitely negate the joint
commitment by Prime Minister David Cameron and President Goodluck Jonathan to
double the volume of bilateral trade between the two countries by 2014.”
It added, “Ambassador Ashiru pointed out that
the decision of the UK government is coming at the time the Commonwealth
Foreign Ministers have unanimously recommended for adoption at the Commonwealth
Heads of Government Meeting in November 2013, a proposal to
remove visa requirements for holders of official and diplomatic passports from
member states.”
Ashiru, who appealed to the UK to reconsider
the proposed policy, noted “that the Federal Government has a
responsibility to take appropriate measures to protect the interests of
Nigerians, who may be affected by it (policy), if finally introduced.
“The minister informed the British High
Commissioner that the Federal Government values the very cordial relations and
strategic partnership between the two countries and would not want the
introduction of any new policy to affect these cherished relations,” the
statement added.
In its own statement, the British
High Commission reiterated that details of the policy were still
being worked out. “No final decision has been made,” the Head of Press
and Public Affairs Section, Rob Fitzpatrick said.
The commission said, “if the plan were to go ahead
in Nigeria, it would affect only a very small number of the highest risk
visitors.”
The statement added, “The vast majority would not
be required to pay a bond. Those paying bonds would receive the bond
back, if they abided by the terms of their visa.
“Let me put this in perspective. Over 180,000
Nigerians apply to visit the UK each year. About 70 per cent or
around 125,000, of those applicants are successful. Travel between our
two countries is a key part of our strong cultural and business relationship.
Financial bonds would be focused on only a tiny minority of potential abusers.
It would not be a “£3,000 visa charge” as some media reporting has
alleged.
“As soon as more details of the policy have been
decided, we will inform the Nigerian government and public fully and
officially, in the spirit of our long standing friendship, and our wish to help
bona fide Nigerian visitors to work, study or do business in the UK.”
Also in Abuja, the Senate raised its
voice against the proposed visa policy and warned that Nigeria
would have to adopt the principle of reciprocity if the UK went ahead to
implement it.
Leader of the Senate, Senator Victor
Ndoma-Egba, said, “ I will like to say immediately that diplomacy
is based on reciprocity and it is not an option that is lost on us. When
we had misunderstanding with South Africa, Nigeria rose to the occasion.
We will always rise to the occasion; but I think the way out is for Nigerians
to have more faith in their country.”
Senator Ita Enang, who is the Chairman
Committee on Rules and Business and his counterparts in
the Petroleum (Downstream) and Navy committees,
also said the policy would greatly hurt relations between Nigeria and
Britain.
Anyanwu, for instance,
advised the UK authorities to be considerate in their
anti-terrorism policies in order not to hurt the ties between Nigeria and
Britain.
She said, “I know it is a way of expressing their
own frustration with the involvement of some Nigerians in negative
things.This is what I think, but it is going to be a very offending
policy; it is surprising that it is coming from Britain because we
have a special historical link with them.
“I think that what Britain ought to do is to
encourage us and fully accept Nigeria as part of its history and not to extend
such a mild form of hostility towards us. We will have to respond in ways that
are loud and clear. We have to tell them that enough is enough.”
Meanwhile, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Mr
Femi Falana, has said he had contacted some human rights
lawyers in the UK to challenge the proposed policy
when passed by the British parliament.
“We will challenge the British government
under their own Human Rights Act and European Human Rights
convention. The law does not allow the UK to target the nationals of any
particular country for extortion. The Federal Government must also be prepared
to retaliate in like manner if the policy is allowed by the British
government,’’ Falana said.
No comments:
Post a Comment